Flower v. Witkovsky
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Tuscola.' (Beach, J.) Case. Defendant brings error. The facts are in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.
The plaintiff sues under section 2, Act No. 259. *372Laws of 1881, as amended by section 16, Act No. 191, Laws of 1883. The declaration contains three counts.
The first count charges in short that the defendant, on the ninth day of November, 1885, in the county of Tuscola, not being then and there a druggist, unlawfully and against the statute sold, furnished, and delivered to one Gideon Dickin* son, Jr., a minor, whisky, which said Dickinson drank, and thereby became intoxicated; and that upon said day, while so intoxicated, he, said Dickinson, drove a horse, attached to a buggy, upon a public…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Brooks v. CookMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
- English v. BeardIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
- Bell v. ZelmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
3Cited by25 opinions
- Naudzius v. LahrMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
- Salas v. ClementsMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
- Village of Brooten, a Municipal Corporation v. Cudahy Packing Company, a Corporation, and the Travelers Indemnity Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961
- LaBlue v. SpeckerMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
- Southern Ry. Co. v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1914
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.