Legal Opinion
State of New Hampshire v. Boston and Maine Corporation
District Court, D. New Hampshire
Decided December 28, 1965No. Civ. A. 2570PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SWEENEY, District Judge.
On June 24, 1964, the Boston and Maine Corporation (B & M), pursuant to Section 13a(1) of the Interstate Commerce Act, 49 U.S.C. § 13a(1), filed with the Interstate Commerce Commission, mailed to the respective Governors of New Hampshire, Maine, Vermont and Massachusetts, and posted in its stations notices that it intended, effective August 8,1964, to discontinue all passenger train service (40 trains) between Boston and points in New Hampshire, Vermont and Maine. 1 As a result of various complaints, the Commission, on July 22,1964, instituted an investigation of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Arrow Transportation Co. v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Luckenbach Steamship Company v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1959
- State of New Jersey v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1959
- Luckenbach Steamship Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- City of Chicago v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- City of Williamsport v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1967
- State of Vermont v. Boston and Maine CorporationDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1967
- City of Chicago v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1969
- State of New York v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.