Legal Opinion

Luckenbach Steamship Co. v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 27, 1960No. 848PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Per curiam

The judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, so far as it relates to the suspension of rates phase of the dispute, is vacated and the case is remanded to the District Court with instructions to dismiss the cause as moot. United States v. Amarillo-Borger Express, 352 U. S. 1028; Atchison, T. & S. F. R. Co. v. Dixie Carriers, 355 U. S. 179. With respect to the antitrust phase of the dispute, the judgment of the District Court is affirmed.

Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas dissent on the holding of Georgia v. Pennsylvania R. Co., 324 U. S. 439.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Georgia v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Arkansas & Louisiana Missouri Railway Co. v. Amarillo-Borger Express, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Atchison, T. & SFR Co. v. Dixie Carriers, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. United States v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures (SCRAP)Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Arrow Transportation Co. v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Municipal Light Boards of Reading and Wakefield Massachusetts v. Federal Power Commission, Boston Edison Company, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
  4. Asphalt Roofing Manufacturers Ass'n v. Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
  5. Port of New York Authority v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API