City of Chicago v. United States
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Douglas
The question in these cases is whether orders of the Interstate Commerce Commission discontinuing investigations respecting the notice of rail carriers to terminate or change the operation or services of interstate passenger trains are judicially reviewable on the. complaint of aggrieved persons.
Section 13a (1) of the Interstate Commerce Act, as amended, 72 Stat. 571, 49 U. S. C. § 13a (1), provides, with details not important here, that a rail carrier may file notice of such discontinuance or change with the Commission and that within 30 days the Commission may make an investigation of the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Rochester Telephone Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Southern Railway Co. v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- State of New Jersey v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1959
- City of Williamsport v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1967
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by71 opinions
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. National Assn. of Railroad PassengersSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Southern Railway Co. v. Seaboard Allied Milling Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Pennsylvania Environmental Council, Inc. v. BartlettDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1970
- Tooahnippah v. HickelSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.