Legal Opinion

Williams v. Elliott

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 13, 1954No. Civ. 15952PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKaufman, J.

This is an appeal by plaintiff from a judgment in favor of defendant in a suit brought to establish a mechanic’s lien for unpaid balance of $557.54, and in favor of defendants on their cross-complaint seeking a refund of $250 paid plaintiff on the contract here involved.

Respondents, owners of a new house, made an agreement with plaintiff, a roofing contractor, to construct a tile roof on their house, and to supply the necessary labor and materials for $660. Respondents were to employ a helper to work under appellant’s directions. The parties agreed that the type of tile would be “Perltex,” a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Thomas Haverty Co. v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Chamberlain v. AbelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  3. Brown v. AguilarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Petersen v. MurphyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  5. Morehouse v. MorehouseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Varni Bros. Corp. v. Wine World, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1995
  2. Miller v. StultsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  3. Western Concrete Structures Co. v. James I. Barnes Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. MURRAY'S IRON WORKS, INC. v. BoyceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  5. Mahoney v. Southland Mental Health Associates Medical GroupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API