Legal Opinion

Mahoney v. Southland Mental Health Associates Medical Group

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 24, 1990No. B044562PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GEORGE, Acting P. J.

Janet Mahoney appeals from a summary judgment of the superior court entered following denial of her request for a continuance of the hearing on the motion for summary judgment filed by respondents Southland Mental Health Associates Medical Group, Perry Maloff, and Arthur Luban. Appellant does not dispute the substantive correctness of the court’s ruling granting the motion for summary judgment but contends the court erred in denying her request for the continuance she sought in order to enable her to file an opposition. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Denham v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Day v. RosenthalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  4. American Continental Insurance v. C & Z Timber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1987
  5. Larson v. SolbakkenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of Falcone & FykeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  2. Scott v. CIBA Vision Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1995
  3. Bahl v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  4. Lerma v. County of OrangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  5. Desaigoudar v. MeyercordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API