Legal Opinion

Miller v. Stults

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 1, 1956No. Civ. 21454PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VALLÉE, J.

Appeal by defendant from an adverse judgment in an action for money alleged to be owing for labor and the use of equipment in summer-fallowing agricultural land in Monterey County.

Prior to May 1944 the land was owned by H H H Land and Livestock Company. Defendant acquired the land in May 1944. Plaintiff Henry Miller and his father farmed the land from 1933 to 1935; Henry and his brother, Raymond, farmed *594it from 1935 .to 1939; and Henry farmed it from 1939 to October 1, 1944. The land was planted to grain. From the time the Millers began farming the land in 1933 part of it was…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Ermolieff v. R. K. O. Radio Pictures, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Hubbard v. DaBellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  3. Shenson v. ShensonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. Roberts Distributing Co. v. Kaye-Halbert Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. Paez v. Mutual Indemnity Accident, Health & Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Daniel Berman v. Freedom Financial Network LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
  2. Peiser v. MettlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Oldenburg v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1957
  4. Centeno v. Roseville Community HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  5. Smyth v. Berman, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API