Legal Opinion

Hennessy v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided September 2, 1924No. S. F. No. 11074PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.

Application for writ of mandamus.

Annie L. Hennessy brought an action in the superior _ court of the city and county of San Francisco against T. E. Haley for the rescission of a certain contract and agreement entered into by said parties and for the cancellation of certain promissory notes executed by Hennessy to Haley, which constituted a part of the transaction for the purchase by Hennessy from Haley of the Spaulding Hotel, situate in the city of San Francisco. The details of the transaction are not important. Judgment went in favor of defendant Haley and against plaintiff Hennessy for costs…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Cahill v. Superior Court of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Inglin v. HoppinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Merced Mining Co. v. FremontCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
  4. S.F. Gas & Elec. Co. v. Superior Court of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Crocker v. ConreyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Sampsell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Miller v. Mun. Court of L. A.California Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Oakes v. McCarthy Co.California Court of Appeal · 1968
  4. Times-Mirror Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Robinson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API