Legal Opinion

DirecTV, Inc. v. State

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 1, 2006No. COA05-1250PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WYNN, Judge.

A tax statute does not violate the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution when the differential tax treatment of “two categories of companies results solely from differences between the nature of their businesses, [and] not from the location of their activities.” 1 In this case, Plaintiffs contend that section 105-164.4(a)(6) of the North Carolina General Statutes, which imposes a sales tax on “[d]irect-to-home satellite service,” but not on cable television service, 2 discriminates against satellite providers and favors cable companies on its face and in its practical…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Exxon Corp. v. Governor of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Oregon Waste Systems, Inc. v. Department of Environmental Quality of Ore.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Hughes v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. DIRECTV, Inc. v. LevinOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  2. DirecTV, Inc. v. TolsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2008
  3. Directv, Inc. v. LevinOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. DIRECTV v. Utah State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 2015
  5. DIRECTV, LLC v. Department of RevenueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2015

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API