Legal Opinion

DIRECTV, LLC v. Department of Revenue

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 18, 2015No. SJC 11658PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLenk, J.

General Laws c. 64M, § 2, imposes a five per cent excise tax on video programming delivered by direct broadcast satellite (tax). The plaintiffs are two companies that provide services subject to the tax (satellite companies). They brought a complaint for declaratory and injunctive relief in the Superior Court, alleging that the tax violates the commerce clause of the United States Constitution. 2 The satellite companies contend that the tax discriminates against interstate commerce, both in its effect and in its purpose, by disfavoring them as compared with those companies that provide video…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Kourouvacilis v. General Motors Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  2. Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Directv, Inc. And Echostar Satellite L.L.C. v. Mark Treesh, Commissioner for the Department of Revenue for the State of KentuckyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  4. Kelly v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. DIRECTV v. Utah State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Maryland Casualty Co. v. NSTAR Electric Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2015
  3. DIRECTV, Inc. v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2015
  4. Florida Department of Revenue v. DirecTV, Inc., etc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2017
  5. Regency Transportation, Inc. v. Commissioner of RevenueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2016

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API