Hargreaves v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WHITE, P. J.
Appellant Darlene Hargreaves appeals from a judgment ordering that she recover nothing by way of her complaint for declaratory relief. In the trial court appellant sued for a declaratory judgment that she, as the named beneficiary, was entitled to the “additional” sum of $10,000 payable as provided in a group insurance certificate and group policy of insurance issued by the Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (hereafter respondent). Respondent’s group policy No. 9000-G provided, in addition to other provisions, for payment of the sum of $10,000 in the event of the death of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
- Continental Casualty Co. v. Phoenix Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1956
- Landress v. Phoenix Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Rock v. Travelers' Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1916
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Frazier v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Weil v. Federal Kemper Life Assurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1994
- Olson v. American Bankers Insurance Co. of FloridaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Spaid v. Cal-Western States Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- Hardy v. Beneficial Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.