Legal Opinion

Hargreaves v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 16, 1980No. Civ. 43778PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WHITE, P. J.

Appellant Darlene Hargreaves appeals from a judgment ordering that she recover nothing by way of her complaint for declaratory relief. In the trial court appellant sued for a declaratory judgment that she, as the named beneficiary, was entitled to the “additional” sum of $10,000 payable as provided in a group insurance certificate and group policy of insurance issued by the Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (hereafter respondent). Respondent’s group policy No. 9000-G provided, in addition to other provisions, for payment of the sum of $10,000 in the event of the death of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Continental Casualty Co. v. Phoenix Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Landress v. Phoenix Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  5. Rock v. Travelers' Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1916

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Frazier v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  2. Weil v. Federal Kemper Life Assurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Olson v. American Bankers Insurance Co. of FloridaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  4. Spaid v. Cal-Western States Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  5. Hardy v. Beneficial Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API