Legal Opinion

Weil v. Federal Kemper Life Assurance Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 1994No. S029652PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GEORGE, J.

In this case we must determine whether a life insurance policy covering loss of life occurring as the direct result of bodily injury inflicted solely by “external, violent and accidental means” provides coverage when the insured’s voluntary ingestion of cocaine resulted in a lethal overdose. Plaintiffs, beneficiaries of the insured, contend that the drug overdose was accidental and therefore that the policy provides coverage. Because the insured’s voluntary ingestion of an illegal and dangerous substance caused his death, defendant insurer contends death did not result from…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Bank of the West v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. AIU Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. United States Mutual Accident Ass'n v. BarrySupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  4. Clemmer v. Hartford Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Mary Jane Wickman v. Northwestern National Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Aydin Corp. v. First State InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Harrell v. Minnesota Mutual Life Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Travelers Cas. & Sur. Co. v. Superior Court of Santa Clara Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1998
  4. Fuller-Austin Insulation Co. v. Highlands InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  5. Heighley v. J.C. Penney Life InsuranceDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2003

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API