Frazier v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LAVINE, J. *
Defendant Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (Metropolitan) appeals from a jury verdict and judgment entered against it. The dispute arises out of a life insurance policy insuring the life of plaintiff’s husband, David Frazier (David), made available to him as part of his employment benefits by the federal government. The policy contained a basic death benefit payable in the event of Frazier’s death, with double indemnity in the event the insured’s death resulted solely from “violent, external and accidental means.” The accidental means death benefit contained a suicide…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Gruenberg v. Aetna InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Comunale v. Traders & General InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Crisci v. Security InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Fletcher v. Western National Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Glendale Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Marina View Heights Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1977
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Murray v. San Jacinto Agency, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1991
- Lewis Eisenberg v. Insurance Company of North America, Cigna CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Carol Jan Solomon, Personal Representative of the Estate of Vincent G. Solomon v. North American Life and Casualty Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Krieger v. Nick Alexander Imports, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1991
- Adrian C. Eichman v. Fotomat Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.