Legal Opinion

Ebsch v. Tanpnaichitr

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 29, 1992No. 62782PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Plaintiffs-appellants Amber and Cynthia Ebsch (“Ebsch”) appeal, on the accelerated docket, the granting of summary judgment in favor of defendantappellee V.S. Tanpnaichitr, administratrix of the estate of Dr. Pricha Tanpnaichitr, M.D. (“Dr. Tan”). 1 For the reasons adduced below, we affirm.

A review of the record reveals that Dr. Tan, a board certified pediatrician, treated Amber from February 11 to July 25, 1988. By letter dated August 9, 1988, Cynthia Ebsch terminated her physician/patient relationship with Dr. Tan and requested that Amber’s medical records be forwarded to a new…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Mitseff v. WheelerOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Wing v. Anchor Media, Ltd.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Viock v. Stowe-Woodward Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Paugh v. HanksOhio Supreme Court · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Mraz v. TaftOhio Court of Appeals · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API