Legal Opinion

Falk v. City of Whitewater

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1974No. 226PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeilfuss, J.

The issue is — do the facts alleged in the amended complaint state a cause of action for negligence?

' The specific contention of appellant Peck on this appeal is that the quoted portions of the complaint do not support a cause of action for negligence “because the making of a fist in and of itself is an intentional act, and that any further act resulting therefrom is likewise intentionally done.”

The oft-repeated general rule regarding the construction of complaints when challenged by demurrer is that the pleadings:

“. . . are to be liberally construed with a view to substantial justice to the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Continental Bank & Trust Co. v. AkwaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Walley v. PatakeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Padilla v. BydalekWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Jennaro v. JennaroWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Libowitz v. Lake Nursing Home, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Coffey v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Rockweit v. SenecalWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Pachucki v. Republic Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Robinson Ex Rel. Robinson v. Mount Sinai Medical CenterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Gouger v. HardtkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API