Falk v. City of Whitewater
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBeilfuss, J.
The issue is — do the facts alleged in the amended complaint state a cause of action for negligence?
' The specific contention of appellant Peck on this appeal is that the quoted portions of the complaint do not support a cause of action for negligence “because the making of a fist in and of itself is an intentional act, and that any further act resulting therefrom is likewise intentionally done.”
The oft-repeated general rule regarding the construction of complaints when challenged by demurrer is that the pleadings:
“. . . are to be liberally construed with a view to substantial justice to the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Continental Bank & Trust Co. v. AkwaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- Walley v. PatakeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
- Padilla v. BydalekWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- Jennaro v. JennaroWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
- Libowitz v. Lake Nursing Home, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Coffey v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
- Rockweit v. SenecalWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
- Pachucki v. Republic Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- Robinson Ex Rel. Robinson v. Mount Sinai Medical CenterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
- Gouger v. HardtkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.