Doe v. San Diego Imperial Council
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McINTYRE, J.
Code of Civil Procedure section 340.1 sets forth the limitations period for actions to recover damages for childhood sexual abuse. (Undesignated statutory references are to the Code of Civil Procedure.) Subdivision (g) of section 340.1 (section 340.1(g)) provides that every plaintiff 26 years of age or older who is making a claim based on allegations of childhood sexual abuse must file a certificate of merit.
In this case, we address the interaction of the statute of limitations and certificate of merit requirement set forth in section 340.1 with the tolling provision of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Shirk v. Vista Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- Diamond Multimedia Systems, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Elsner v. UvegesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- Laird v. BlackerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- People v. Greg F.California Supreme Court · 2012
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Doe v. Roman Catholic Archbishop etc.California Court of Appeal · 2016
- PD Doe v. San Diego-Imperial Council, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Roe JB 65 v. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day SaintsDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2025
- Roe v. Doe 1California Court of Appeal · 2024