Legal Opinion

David v. Medtronic, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 26, 2015No. B254914MPublished

1Opinion of the Court

Filed 6/26/15 (unmodified opinion attached) CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION EIGHT BRANDON R. DAVID et al., B254914 Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC510542) v. ORDER MODIFYING OPINION MEDTRONIC, INC., et al., [There is no change in judgment] Defendants and Respondents, GOOD CAUSE appearing, the opinion filed June 12, 2015, in the above entitled matter is hereby modified as follows: 1. Page 9, delete the sentence that reads: “On appeal, defendants do not argue that Dr. Michelson was…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Stangvik v. Shiley Inc.California Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Hanberry v. Hearst Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1969
  3. Donald R. Wild and Diana H. Wild v. Subscription Plus, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
  4. In Re Rezulin Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
  5. Allan Alexander Watson, (84-3366), and Vicki Elizabeth Crallan, (84-3495), and Andrew James Skinner (84-3796) v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API