In re Skoll
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
LANE, Judge.
This is an appeal from the decision of the Patent and Trademark Office Board of Appeals affirming the examiner’s rejection of claims 10-15, all of the claims in application serial No. 152,412, filed June 11, 1971 for a “Method of Electroless Plating.” We affirm in part and reverse in part.
Background
The subject matter of the claims is an aqueous solution for electroless plating. The solution contains a water-soluble metal salt, a water-soluble hydrolyzed carbohydrate, and a gluconic acid component selected from the group consisting of gluconic acid, glucono delta lactone, and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Application of Philip A. Shaffer, JrCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
- Application of James H. Saunders and Paul G. GemeinhardtCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
- Application of Sol D. Gershon, Melvin A. Goldberg and Oscar W. NeiditchCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
- In re SkonerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1975
- In re KroekelCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
3Cited by19 opinions
- Fresenius Usa, Inc. v. Baxter International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- In re EdwardsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1978
- In re JohnsonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1977
- In re ClintonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1976
- Janssen Pharmaceutica N v. v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals., Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2006
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.