In re Edwards
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
LANE, Judge.
This appeal is from the decision of the Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) Board *1350of Appeals (board) affirming the final rejection of claim 3, the sole claim in application serial No. 110,599, filed January 28, 1971, entitled “Water Insoluble Nitrogen-Containing Polyols.”1 We reverse.
The Invention
Appellants’ invention is directed to a water-insoluble polyol (a poly-hydroxyl compound) which has sufficient self-catalytic activity to react, without the need of extraneous catalysts, with organic polyisocyanates to form rigid polyurethane foams. It is asserted that the foams produced…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Application of Heinrich Ruschig, Walter Aumuller, Gerhard Korger, Hans Wagner, Josef Scholz and Alfred BanderCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
- In re WertheimCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1976
- Application of Carl A. Lukach, Setha G. Olson and Harold M. SpurlinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
- In re SmithCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
- In re SmithCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- University of Rochester v. G.D. Searle & Co., Inc., Monsanto Company, Pharmacia Corporation, and Pfizer Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Enzo Biochem, Inc. v. Gen-Probe Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- In Re Walter Kaslow and Uniform Product Code Council, Inc. (Uppc), IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Gilbert P. Hyatt v. Gary W. BooneCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Yoshihiro Fujikawa, Mikio Suzuki, Hiroshi Iwasaki, Mitsuaki Sakashita and Masaki Kitahara v. Sompong Wattanasin, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.