Legal Opinion
Application of Sol D. Gershon, Melvin A. Goldberg and Oscar W. Neiditch
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided February 16, 1967No. Patent Appeal 7722PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALMOND, Judge.
This is an appeal from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals affirming final rejection of claims 1 to 14 of application serial No. 209,279, filed July 12, 1962, entitled “Fluoride Dentifrice.”
The invention relates to a buffered fluoride dentifrice, in the form of either tooth paste or tooth power, comprising at least one fluoride-compatible polish ing agent; a water-soluble, ionizable, anti-caries fluoride; a buffering agent in an amount sufficient to maintain a pH from 5 to 6 for the dentifrice in saliva; and optionally, a germicide. -
Claim 1 is illustrative of the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Application of Charles H. Goodman, Edward K. Rice, Klaus Rosenstern and George W. LenzieCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
3Cited by11 opinions
- The Gillette Company v. S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- In re KronigCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1976
- In re SkollCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1975
- In Re Klaus HeckCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- In re NaberCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.