Gahre v. Berry
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in tbe district court for Hennepin county to determine adverse claims to real estate. The case was tried before Harrison, J., and a jury, which rendered a verdict in favor of defendant, and that she was entitled to receive $319.50 as damages for detention of the premises. From an order denying a motion for a new trial, plaintiff appealed.
Read the full summary
Action in tbe district court for Hennepin county to determine adverse claims to real estate. The case was tried before Harrison, J., and a jury, which rendered a verdict in favor of defendant, and that she was entitled to receive $319.50 as damages for detention of the premises. From an order denying a motion for a new trial, plaintiff appealed. The notice of expiration of redemption, referred to in the opinion, so far as material, was as follows: “You are hereby notified that, pursuant to tax judgment — entered in the district court, county of Hennepin, state of Minnesota, as above stated —…
1Opinion of the Court
LEWIS, X
Action to determine adverse claims. On a former appeal it was decided that the defendant was entitled to a second trial, under G. S. 1894, § 5845. There are two questions, only, calling for any notice on this appeal.
1. The plaintiff claims through a tax deed, and his title rests upon the validity of the notice of redemption from the tax sale. This notice is exactly like the one considered in the case of Mather v. Gurley, 75 Minn. 248, 77 N. W. 957, and there held to be invalid because it' did not state that the time to redeem would expire at the end of sixty days. Counsel for…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Mather v. CurleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
3Cited by5 opinions
- Young v. RohanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925
- Lawton v. BarkerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
- State ex rel. National Fire Insurance v. ScottSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
- Walker v. MartinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- Roessler v. RomerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904