Legal Opinion

Walker v. Martin

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 21, 1902No. Nos. 13,302-(256)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the district court for St. Louis county entered pursuant to the order of Dibell, J. The book known as the tax duplicate list was used as, and is, ■a full compliance with the statute as an assessment book,- sufficient to give notice of the expiration of redemption. The tax duplicate list is the book where the assessment is recorded. It contains the certificate of the county auditor.

Read the full summary

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the district court for St. Louis county entered pursuant to the order of Dibell, J. The book known as the tax duplicate list was used as, and is, ■a full compliance with the statute as an assessment book,- sufficient to give notice of the expiration of redemption. The tax duplicate list is the book where the assessment is recorded. It contains the certificate of the county auditor. The resolution ■of the board of equalization, and the act of the auditor in indorsing the same in the tax list book, and in certifying to the duplicate tax list, made a valid…

1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.

Action to determine adverse claims to real estate. The complaint alleged that the plaintiff was the owner in fee of certain land in the county of St. Louis, describing it; that it was unoccupied; and that the defendant claimed some right or title therein adverse to the plaintiff. The answer put in issue the plaintiff’s title, and alleged that the defendant was the owner of the land. The trial court found as a fact that the plaintiff was the owner of the land in fee, and directed judgment for him accordingly, which was entered, from which the defendant appealed.

The assignments of error raise…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. McFarlandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
  2. Western Land Ass'n v. McComberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  3. Sperry v. GoodwinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  4. Eide v. ClarkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
  5. State v. Crookston Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1902

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Shine v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
  2. State ex rel. National Fire Insurance v. ScottSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
  3. Trask v. SkoogSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  4. Roessler v. RomerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
  5. Foster v. McClureSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API