Legal Opinion
Mather v. Curley
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 11, 1899No. Nos. 11,286—(172)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
From an order of the district court for Hennepin county, Simpson, J., denying a new trial, plaintiff appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtCanty, J.
This is an action to determine adverse claims to real estate. The trial court found for defendant, and plaintiff appeals from an order denying a new trial.
The notice of expiration of redemption from the tax sale stated,
“That the time allowed by law for redemption from said sale will have expired after sixty days have elapsed after service of this notice has been made, and proof thereof, and of the sheriff’s fees, has been filed in this [the county auditor’s] office.”
Respondent contends that this notice is void because it does not state when the time to redeem will expire, and, in our opinion,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State ex rel. Kipp v. NordSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
- Peterson v. P. P. Mast & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
3Cited by5 opinions
- Olson v. BuskeySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
- Lawton v. BarkerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
- Gahre v. BerrySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
- State ex rel. National Fire Insurance v. ScottSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
- Blanchard v. HoffmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923