Legal Opinion

Young v. Rohan

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 2, 1925No. 10,951PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Denison

Margaret Rohan had a decree in her suit to quiet title to lots in Denver. Young, and others, defendants below, bring error.

The complaint contained, with much else, the usual allegations of title and possession in plaintiff and claim of interest by defendants. The answer denies the allegations of the complaint, except that it admits claim of interest, and states, that defendants are owners in fee. The replication denies the answer and sets out certain facts which plaintiff claims invalidate a tax deed under which defendants claim, and alleges a tax deed to one Sternberger for the tax of 1913…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State Finance Co. v. BeckNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Empire Ranch & Cattle Co. v. BenderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1911
  3. Wilson v. McKennaIllinois Supreme Court · 1869
  4. Wisner v. ChamberlinIllinois Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Benefield v. AlbertIllinois Supreme Court · 1890

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. City & County of Denver v. MurrySupreme Court of Colorado · 1927
  2. Green v. HalstedSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925
  3. Ireland v. Gunnison Mountain Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1930
  4. Bennett v. MorrisonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925
  5. Flader v. CampbellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1949

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API