City of Los Angeles v. Los Angeles City Water Co.
California Supreme Court
MOTION to dismiss appeals from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County settling the accounts of a receiver. John L. Campbell, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. White & Monroe, John Garber, and J. S. Chapman, for Los Angeles City Water Company, Appellant. Graves, O’Melveny & Shankland, for Frank A. Gibson, Receiver, Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
After the commencement of the above action, the superior court appointed a receiver to collect, pending the action, the water rates theretolore collected by the defendant water company. This order was annulled by this court, May 5,1899, upon the application of the water company. (Los Angeles v. Los Angeles Water Co., 124 Cal. 385.) Thereafter, the receiver presented his account to the superior court for settlement, and after a hearing thereon, the following entry was made in the minutes of that court, September 23, 1899: “ It is ordered that the objection of the defendant to the payment of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Trustees v. GreenoughSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Hovey v. McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Ruggles v. WelchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Grant v. Superior Court of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Rochat v. GeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Sjoberg v. HastorfCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Title Ins. Trust Co. v. Calif. Etc. Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
- Elliott v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Howe v. Key System Transit Co.California Supreme Court · 1926
- Rossi v. CaireCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.