Legal Opinion

Jones v. Lamont

California Supreme Court

Decided October 8, 1897No. Sac. No. 309PublishedCited by 46 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sacramento County distributing the estate of a deceased person. Matt F. Johnson, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

CHIPMAN, C.

Appeal from decree of distribution. The controversy arises out of a certain contract of separation between deceased in her lifetime and her surviving husband, appellant. The court found that the husband had no interest in the wife’s estate, she having died intestate. The court also found that shortly prior to May 29, 1884, the said deceased commenced an action' against her said husband for divorce and division of the property: that a compromise was agreed to on said day last named, pursuant to which the agreement in question was entered into *500and the suit for divorce and division of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Rains v. WheelerTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Ruggles v. WelchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Senter v. De BernalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  4. In re Estate of DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Bates v. RybergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Grimm v. GrimmCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Meehan v. HoppsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. McCabe v. HealyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Thomas v. HosselkusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Estate of McNuttCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API