Legal Opinion

Roach v. Coffey

California Supreme Court

Decided August 30, 1887No. 12000PublishedCited by 31 opinions

Application for a writ of mandate. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.

— This is a petition to compel the respondent, by a writ of mandamus, to settle certain proposed cross-interrogatories.

During the pendency of the administration of the estate of Thomas H. Blythe, deceased, in the court of respondent, one Florence Blythe, in pursuance of section 1664 of the Code of Civil Procedure, filed her petition in said court for the purpose of ascertaining and declaring the rights of all persons to said estate, and to whom distribution thereof should be made. Notice was issued on said petition, and after the return day thereof the said Florence filed her complaint as…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re Estate of WrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. McCabe v. HealyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Ruggles v. WelchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Thomas v. HosselkusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Jones v. LamontCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  5. In Re Miller's EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API