Dool v. First National Bank
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, J.
In this action plaintiffs seek to have a certain note and trust deed declared void and canceled, and to have the title to certain real property in Imperial County quieted. The complaint alleges that Edward Dool, one of the parties who executed a certain note and trust deed, was, at the time of the signing the same, entirely without understanding, within the meaning of section 38 of the Civil Code. It also alleges a rescission, it being set forth in this connection that the plaintiffs offered to return everything they had received, but that they received nothing of value. Plaintiffs admit in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Savings & Loan Society v. BurnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Gnarini v. Swiss American BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Hakes Investment Co. v. LyonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Western Fuel Co. v. Sanford G. Lewald Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
- Ellison v. HenionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re TorrezUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California · 1991
- Matthews v. HintonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Burnand v. IrigoyenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Houk v. Williams Bros., Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1943
- Oil Tool Exchange, Inc. v. SchuhCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944