Ellison v. Henion
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court, Frank J. Gordon, Welles Whitmore and R. McMurchie for Appellant. Rothchild, Golden & Rothchild and J.A. Pritchard for Respondents.
1Opinion of the CourtOlney, J.
This is an appeal by the defendant from a money judgment against him. The following facts appear without dispute:' The defendant and two men by the name of Pike were stockholders and officers of a corporation known as the Pike Woolen Company, and the defendant and one of the Pikes executed to the plaintiffs a joint guaranty of any indebtedness that the Woolen Company might incur to them. The Woolen Company did incur such an indebtedness in the sum of $4,436.81. Thereafter the Woolen Company became embarassed financially, and for the purpose off arranging its indebtedness executed two notes,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Goldman v. MurrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Black v. SippyOregon Supreme Court · 1888
- Harris v. JohnstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1806
- Harris v. JohnstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1806
- Looney v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
3Cited by14 opinions
- Maron v. HowardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Western Fuel Co. v. Sanford G. Lewald Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
- Tucker v. NicholsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Kress v. Tooker-Jordan Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1930
- Plitt v. StonebrakerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.