Legal Opinion
In Re Torrez
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California
Decided June 12, 1991No. 19-20607PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RICHARD T. FORD, Bankruptcy Judge.
I
INTRODUCTION
This opinion determines several matters. First, does this Court have jurisdiction to decide this controversy as a contested matter or should it have been brought by way of adversary proceeding? Secondly, if properly before the Court as a contested matter, does the moving party have standing under 11 U.S.C. § 1109(b) to appear and be heard and is permissive intervention under Bankruptcy Rule 2018(a) appropriate? Lastly, if determined to be a contested matter and if the moving party has standing and is permitted to intervene, was the…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- United States v. Whiting Pools, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- In Re Pacor, Inc. v. John Higgins, Jr. And Louise HigginsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Begier v. Internal Revenue ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Dickerson v. New Banner Institute, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- In re Amatex Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Baron & Budd, P.C. v. Unsecured Asbestos CommitteeDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2005
- Williams v. Levi (In Re Williams)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Krys v. Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Refco Inc. (In Re Refco Inc.)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- In Re E.S. Bankest, L.C.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 2005
- Carabetta Enterprises, Inc. v. City of Asbury Park (In Re Carabetta Enterprises, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 1993
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.