Legal Opinion

Matthews v. Hinton

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 2, 1965No. Civ. 10787PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFriedman, J.

The trial court granted a summary judgment motion denying relief to appellants on their cross-complaint seeking damages for an allegedly wrongful sale by a trust deed holder. They appeal.

Appellants are Clarence and Mabel Matthews, husband and wife, who owned a tract of unimproved land. In May 1960 they leased it for 65 years to Nick Pandelis Homes, Inc. Rental was fixed at $350 per month during the first five years of tenancy and $400 per month during the remainder of the term, with adjustments for changes in dollar purchasing power. The lessee had power to sublet and assign. In a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Eagle Oil & Refining Co. v. PrenticeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Loma Portal Civic Club v. American Airlines, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Everts v. MattesonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Chapman v. Great Western Gypsum Co.California Supreme Court · 1932
  5. California National Bank v. GintyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Republic National Life Insurance Co. v. Lorraine Realty Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  2. Middlebrook-Anderson Co. v. Southwest Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  3. Miller v. Citizens Sav. & Loan Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. Cambridge Acceptance Corp. v. HocksteinNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
  5. In Re TorrezUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California · 1991

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API