Legal Opinion
Westfield Companies v. Knapp
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided March 23, 2004No. 56A03-0304-CV-141PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MAY, Judge.
The Westfield Companies appeal summary judgment in favor of Ralph and Joanne Knapp and Scott Spangle (collec— tively, "the msureds”)
Westfield muses three issues on appeal which we consohdate and restate as:
1. Whether a pickup truck used for loading melons on a farm is "mobile equipment" and. therefore excluded from coverage by an insurance poli-ey's motor vehicle exclusion; and.2. Whether the trial court properly de- ' termined Spangle was on the Knapp property with permission and therefore was entitled to recover under the medical payment provision of the policy.
We affirm…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Meridian Mutual Insurance v. Auto-Owners InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
- Miller v. GeelsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
- American Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. HallIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
- Poulard v. LauthIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
- American Family Insurance Group v. JohnIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
3Cited by31 opinions
- John M. Abbott, LLC, Class Representative and All Others Similarly Situated v. Lake City BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014
- Brill v. Regent Communications, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2014
- Masten v. Amco Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- Hemocleanse, Inc. v. Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2005
- City of Clinton v. GoldnerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.