Legal Opinion

Miller v. Geels

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 30, 1994No. 53A01-9402-CV-49PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NAJAM, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE 1

In this small claims action we apply the Indiana Security Deposits statute, the Bloomington Housing Code, 2 and the com mon law of contracts in a landlord-tenant dispute. Lora A. Miller and Cynthia A. San-tagata (the "tenants") appeal from the trial court's judgment in favor of Donald E. Geels, their landlord (the "landlord"). The tenants and two other students at Indiana University leased a house in Bloomington from the landlord. After termination of the tenancy and notice to the tenants, the landlord applied the tenants' entire security deposit to unpaid…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Hinshaw v. Board of Com'rs of Jay CountyIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Criss v. BitzegaioIndiana Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Ethyl Corp. v. Forcum-Lannom Associates, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Meehan v. MeehanIndiana Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Lutz v. New Albany City Plan CommissionIndiana Supreme Court · 1951

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Henthorne v. Legacy Healthcare, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Westfield Companies v. KnappIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Homer v. BurmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. Kwolek v. SwickardIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. Pinnacle Properties v. SaulkaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API