Miller v. Geels
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
NAJAM, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE 1
In this small claims action we apply the Indiana Security Deposits statute, the Bloomington Housing Code, 2 and the com mon law of contracts in a landlord-tenant dispute. Lora A. Miller and Cynthia A. San-tagata (the "tenants") appeal from the trial court's judgment in favor of Donald E. Geels, their landlord (the "landlord"). The tenants and two other students at Indiana University leased a house in Bloomington from the landlord. After termination of the tenancy and notice to the tenants, the landlord applied the tenants' entire security deposit to unpaid…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Hinshaw v. Board of Com'rs of Jay CountyIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
- Criss v. BitzegaioIndiana Supreme Court · 1981
- Ethyl Corp. v. Forcum-Lannom Associates, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1982
- Meehan v. MeehanIndiana Supreme Court · 1981
- Lutz v. New Albany City Plan CommissionIndiana Supreme Court · 1951
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Henthorne v. Legacy Healthcare, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2002
- Westfield Companies v. KnappIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
- Homer v. BurmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
- Kwolek v. SwickardIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- Pinnacle Properties v. SaulkaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.