Legal Opinion
City of Clinton v. Goldner
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided April 30, 2008No. 83A01-0708-CV-358PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SHARPNACK, Judge.
The City of Clinton appeals the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to Todd Goldner. The City raises three issues, which we revise and restate as:
I. Whether the trial court erred by granting Goldner’s motion for summary judgment; and
II. Whether the trial court abused its discretion by awarding Goldner liquidated damages and attorney fees pursuant to the Wage Payment Statute.
We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.
The relevant facts follow. On December 16, 2003, Goldner began working as a probationary patrolman with the Clinton Police Department. After one…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Mangold Ex Rel. Mangold v. Indiana Department of Natural ResourcesIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
- Eddie Trail and Katrinka Trail v. Boys and Girls Clubs of Northwest IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
- Bolin v. WingertIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
- GKC Indiana Theatres, Inc. v. Elk Retail Investors, LLC.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2002
- Naugle v. Beech Grove City SchoolsIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Mathis v. Brown & Brown of South Carolina, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
- City of Lawrence Utilites Service Board, City of Lawrence, Indiana, and Mayor Dean Jessup, Individually and in his Official Capacity v. Carlton E. CurryIndiana Supreme Court · 2017
- Earl F. Shields, Larry J. Shields, and Robert L. Shields v. Rodney L. TaylorIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
- Vargas v. ShepherdIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
- Edward Skillman v. Ivy Tech Community CollegeIndiana Court of Appeals · 2016
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.