Legal Opinion
State v. Heinsen
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided September 9, 2005No. Nos. 28,820, 28,821PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MINZNER, Justice.
{1} This consolidated appeal challenges a ruling by the Court of Appeals that the State has no right to appeal from a suppression order of a magistrate court and that the district court has no subject matter jurisdiction to hear such an appeal. State v. Heinsen, 2004-NMCA-110, ¶¶ 1, 27, 136 N.M. 295, 97 P.3d 627. We granted certiorari because the State’s appeals present issues of substantial public interest concerning the jurisdiction of the district court over such appeals under the doctrine of practical finality and the impact of the ruling on judicial resources. See…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Kelly Inn No. 102, Inc. v. KapnisonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
- High Ridge Hinkle Joint Venture v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. ArnoldNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1947
- County of Los Alamos v. TapiaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
- Wilson v. DenverNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- State v. GarzaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. NealNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
- State v. SavedraNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2010
- City of Las Cruces v. SanchezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. CarreonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2006
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.