Legal Opinion
Angara v. City of Chicago
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided July 20, 1995No. 94 C 5199PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ALESIA, District Judge.
The plaintiff, Ponciano Angara, filed a three-count amended complaint alleging a number of federal claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and a state law false imprisonment claim. The defendants have filed a motion to dismiss pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). For the reasons set forth below, defendants’ motion to dismiss is granted in part and denied in part.
I. BACKGROUND
The following is a summary of the facts in the light most favorable to the plaintiff. Beginning in 1987 and continuing until May 1994, the plaintiff worked as a mason inspector for…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Driebel v. City Of MilwaukeeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- Grow v. City of MilwaukeeDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2000
- Nutrasweet Co. v. X-L Engineering Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1996
- Driebel, Robert J. v. City of MilwaukeeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- Angara v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.