Legal Opinion

Angara v. City of Chicago

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided December 12, 1996No. 94 C 5199PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

MORTON DENLOW, United States Magistrate Judge.

Plaintiff Poneiano S. Angara (“Angara”) has filed a Motion For Leave To File a Second Amended Complaint seeking to add the City of Chicago as a defendant under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The parties agreed that to expedite consideration, the motion would be treated pursuant to the Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) standard rather than the Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(a) standard. For the reasons stated below, the Court finds that Angara has alleged sufficient facts to state a cause of action and his Motion For Leave To File a Second Amended Complaint is…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Pembaur v. City of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. City of St. Louis v. PraprotnikSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Spell v. McDanielCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
  5. William McNabola v. Chicago Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. O'Gorman v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API