Nutrasweet Co. v. X-L Engineering Corp.

OPINION AND ORDER

NORGLE, District Judge:

Before the court are Defendants’ Motions to Suppress Evidence [Doc. # 9-1], Quash Statements [Doc. # 9-2], and Dismiss the Complaint [Docs. # 9-3 & 10-1]. 1 For the following reasons, the motions are denied.

I. Motion to Suppress Evidence

Defendants X-L Engineering Corp. (“XL”) and Paul Prikos (“Prikos”) (collectively, “Defendants”) first move this court to suppress all evidence generated from investigations made by the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (“IEPA”) and the Illinois State Police (“ISP”). Defendants argue that the investigators never…