Legal Opinion

Miller v. Scottish Union & National Insurance

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1894PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Bay. (Cobb, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

This is an action on a policy of insurance. The policy was issued from the agency of the company at Bay City, and was duly countersigned by George Washington, the agent at that place. The plaintiffs made application to Knaggs & Plum, insurance agents at Bay City, to place $10,000 of insurance on their mill. Knaggs & Plum, being unable to place the whole amount in companies represented by them, applied in turn to Mr. Washington to write the policy in question, which he did. On examining the policy, Knaggs & Plum called the attention of Mr. Washington to the fact that the mill was mortgaged,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Innerarity v. Merchants' National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885
  2. Busch v. WilcoxMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  3. McGraw v. Germania Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hoekzema v. Van HaftenMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Samuels v. Detroit Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Curwood v. Peninsular Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API