Legal Opinion

Curwood v. Peninsular Fire Insurance

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 10, 1924No. Docket No. 39PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to Shiawassee; Collins (Joseph H.), J. Case by James Oliver Curwood against the Peninsular Fire Insurance Company of America for fraud in the sale of corporate stock. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

It is the claim of the plaintiff that he bought 150 shares of stock belonging to the defendant company for $9,000; that he was induced to make the purchase by the fraudulent representation of defendant’s agent. He sued to recover the money paid. From a verdict and judgment in favor of the plaintiff the case comes into this court by writ of error.

The defense of the defendant is indicated by the notice attached to the plea of the general issue as follows:

“First: That on or about the 27th day of October, 1921, Colon C. Lillie, president of the defendant, entered into a certain contract in the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Allen v. South Boston RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
  2. Adams Mining Co. v. SenterMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Ceeder v. H. M. Loud & Sons Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Eureka Iron & Steel Works v. BresnahanMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Whitaker v. KilroyMichigan Supreme Court · 1888

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Radloff v. Ruggles Motor Truck Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API