Legal Opinion

Busch v. Wilcox

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 10, 1890PublishedCited by 37 opinions

Error to Wavne. (Brevoort, J.) Case. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtChamrlin, C. J.

In October, 1882, one Remick held the legal title to certain lands in Mackinac county to the amount of about 2,000 acres, and one McKay claimed the *317beneficial interest. Remick had advanced the money to pay for the lands, and held them subject to a purchase on estimates by McKay within a given time. The amount advanced by Remick was about $1,000. McKay attempted to make sale of these lands to Buffalo parties, and through a broker there applied to the firm of Noyes & Sawyer, who were lumber dealers at Buffalo. They telegraphed George A. Wilcox, of Detroit, to investigate, and the result was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Holcomb v. NobleMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  2. J. G. Seigle & Son v. Badger Lumber Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1904

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. BlackMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Grand Trunk Western R. Co. v. HW Nelson Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
  3. Knappen v. FreemanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
  4. Aldrich v. ScribnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Sullivan v. UlrichMichigan Supreme Court · 1949

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API