Legal Opinion

Innerarity v. Merchants' National Bank

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 13, 1885PublishedCited by 97 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDevens, J.

This is an action of tort, for the conversion of four hundred and fifty-five hogsheads of sugar, four hundred and forty-four of which had constituted a part of the cargo of a vessel called the J. H. Lane, and eleven of which had constituted a part of a cargo of another vessel, called the Unity. The questions as to the latter lot will not require separate consideration, if it shall be determined that, as to the larger lot, the plaintiffs are not entitled to maintain their action. The sugar shipped by the J. H. Lane was, by a bill of lading, consigned to Benjamin Burgess and Sons, and purported…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Loring v. BrodieMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
  2. National Security Bank v. CushmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
  3. Atlantic National Bank v. HarrisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
  4. Stevenson v. Bay CityMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  5. Winchester v. Baltimore & Susquehanna R. R.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1853

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by97 opinions

  1. American Surety Company v. PaulySupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Atlantic Cotton Mills v. Indian Orchard MillsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
  3. Benedict v. . ArnouxNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
  4. Allen v. South Boston RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
  5. Henry v. . AllenNew York Court of Appeals · 1896

92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API