McGraw v. Germania Fire Insurance
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Bay. (Green, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.
So far as the questions raised in the record refer to the proofs of loss, and the attempt at cancellation, we *148con cm1 in the results arrived at by Judge Champlin, that there is no error. But we think there is no error in the rulings depending on the supposed agency of the firm of Knaggs, Clark & Plum, under which the court below properly, as we think, excluded any responsibility against McGraw for what they may have done or omitted.
It is certainly worthy of some consideration how far those questions could be raised at all under the facts as shown by defendant. The policy in suit, if valid,…
2Cited by24 opinions
- Commercial Union Assurance Co. v. State ex rel. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- Pollock v. German Fire-InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. McTyierTennessee Supreme Court · 1924
- Michigan Pipe Co. v. Michigan Fire & Marine InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
- Plumb v. Penn Mutual Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.