Legal Opinion

Whirlpool Corp. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided February 1, 2016No. Slip Op. 16-8; Court 14-00199PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

Stanceu, Chief Judge:

Plaintiff Whirlpool Corporation (“Whirlpool”) contests a 2014 decision (the “Final Scope Ruling”) of the International Trade Administration, United States Department of Commerce (“Commerce” or “the Department”) interpreting the scope of anti-dumping and countervailing duty orders (the “Orders”) to include two types of kitchen appliance door handles that Whirlpool imported. The Orders apply to certain “aluminum extrusions” from the People’s Republic of China.

Before the court is Whirlpool’s motion for judgment on. the agency record, in which Whirlpool…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Duferco Steel, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
  2. Mid Continent Nail Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
  3. Shenyang Yuanda Aluminum Industry Engineering Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
  4. Shenyang Yuanda Aluminum Industry Engineering Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2014
  5. Plasticoid Manufacturing Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2014

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. IKEA Supply AG v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2016
  2. Whirlpool Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2016
  3. Whirlpool Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API