IKEA Supply AG v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
GOLDBERG, Senior Judge:
Plaintiff IKEA Supply AG (“IKEA”) challenges a decision by the U.S. Department of Commerce (“Commerce”) interpreting the scopes of two antidumping and countervailing duty orders (the “Orders,” which state their scopes in essentially identical terms) to include towel racks that IKEA imported. Final Scope Ruling, PD 39 (Apr. 27, 2015) (interpreting Aluminum Extrusions from the People’s Republic of China: Antidumping Duty Order, 76 Fed. Reg. 30,650 (Dep’t Commerce May 26, 2011) (“AD Order”); Aluminum Extrusions from the People’s Republic of China:…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Duferco Steel, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- King Supply Co., LLC v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Mid Continent Nail Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Tak Fat Trading Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Itochu Building Products v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Agilent Technologies v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2017
- IKEA Supply AG v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2017
- Ikea Supply AG v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2017