Legal Opinion
Mid Continent Nail Corp. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided July 18, 2013No. 2012-1682, 2012-1683PublishedCited by 57 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DYK, Circuit Judge.
Defendants Target Corporation and the United States appeal from a judgment of the Court of International Trade (“Trade Court”) rejecting the Department of Commerce’s (“Commerce”) interpretation of an antidumping order on nails from the People’s Republic of China. The Trade Court held that the steel nails included in certain household tool kits imported by Target were subject to the order. We vacate the judgment, and remand to the Trade Court with directions that it remand to Commerce for further proceedings.
Background
I
When participants in a domestic industry believe that…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Morton v. RuizSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- National Labor Relations Board v. Bell Aerospace Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Christopher v. Smithkline Beecham Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Novosteel Sa v. United States, and Bethlehem Steel Corporation and U.S. Steel Group, a Unit of Usx Corporation (Now Known as United States Steel Llc)Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- General Electric Company v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Meridian Products, LLC v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Ams Associates, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Omg, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
- Saha Thai Steel Pipe Public Company Limited v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2024
- Shenyang Yuanda Aluminum Industry Engineering Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2016
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.