Legal Opinion
Calzada v. ASTURE
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 17, 2010No. 09 Civ. 3926(RJS)(MHD)PublishedCited by 172 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
RICHARD J. SULLIVAN, District Judge.
On April 20, 2009, Plaintiff Angelo Luis Calzada, who is proceeding pro se, filed a complaint appealing Defendant Commissioner of Social Security Administration’s denial of his application for Supplemental Security Income benefits. The Court referred this matter to the Honorable Michael H, Dolinger, Magistrate Judge, on April 29, 2009. On August 13, 2009, Defendant moved pursuant to Rule 12(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for judgment on the pleadings. Plaintiff never filed opposition papers.
On October 21,…
2Cases cited58 opinions
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Ysabel Rosa v. John S. Callahan, Acting Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Rita Schaal v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social Security, 1 Dockets 96-6212, 96-6316Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by172 opinions
- Norman v. AstrueDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Kane v. AstrueDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- Rousey v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- Klemens v. BerryhillCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
- Colbert v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
167 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.