Legal Opinion
Rousey v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.
District Court, S.D. Illinois
Decided January 11, 2018No. 16 Civ. 9500 (HBP)PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PITMAN, United States Magistrate Judge:
I. Introduction
Plaintiff brings this action pursuant to section 205(g) of the Social Security Act (the "Act"), 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), seeking judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security ("Commissioner") denying her application for disability insurance benefits ("DIB"). The parties have consented to my exercising plenary jurisdiction in this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (Docket Item ("D.I.") 17). Both parties have moved for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Rule 12(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (D.I.…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Sullivan v. ZebleySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Talavera v. Commr of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- Rita Schaal v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social Security, 1 Dockets 96-6212, 96-6316Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Barnhart v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Ablan-Woodrow v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2022
- Bockeno v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2021
- Bogner v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022
- Borzellere v. KijakaziDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2022
- Bridge v. SaulDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2020
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.