Legal Opinion
Salsbury Industries v. The United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided July 27, 1990No. 89-1592PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MAYER, Circuit Judge.
Salsbury Industries appeals the judgment of the United States Claims Court, 17 Cl.Ct. 47 (1989), sustaining the convenience termination of Salsbury’s contract with the United States Postal Service and denying Salsbury certain incentive payments. We affirm.
Background
The Postal Service solicited bids for the manufacture and installation of aluminum post office lockboxes, and Salsbury and four other bidders were awarded contracts. Salsbury’s contract required delivery of 2900 lockboxes for $9.7 million, and provided for an additional ten percent incentive payment for…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Torncello v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
- GTE Sylvania, Inc. v. Consumers Union of the United States, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- John Reiner & Company, Individually and to the Use of Kurz & Root Company (Incorporated) v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- Sol O. Schlesinger, Doing Business as Ideal Uniform Cap Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Linan-Faye Construction Co., Inc. v. Housing Authority of the City of CamdenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Krygoski Construction Company, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Textron Defense Systems v. Sheila E. Widnall, Secretary of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- T & M Distributors, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Caldwell & Santmyer, Inc. v. Dan Glickman, Secretary of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.