Legal Opinion
Sol O. Schlesinger, Doing Business as Ideal Uniform Cap Company v. The United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided February 16, 1968No. 155-56PublishedCited by 90 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVIS, Judge: *
The question here is how to treat the Government’s termination of plaintiff’s contract for default. The defendant and the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals take the position that the default-termination was proper. Our trial commissioner and the plaintiff insist that it was a breach of the contract and should be dealt with as such. We hold that the termination should be considered as one for the convenience of the Government.
We place this conclusion on the facts found by the ASBCA (or proved conclusively by the record before it): On February 24, 1955, plaintiff…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- John Reiner & Company, Individually and to the Use of Kurz & Root Company (Incorporated) v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- United States v. Acme Process Equipment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Dale Construction Co. v. United States, Seaboard Surety Co.United States Court of Claims · 1964
- New York Shipbuilding Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- John A. Johnson Contracting Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1955
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by90 opinions
- Torncello v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
- Lisbon Contractors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Mega Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
- J. D. Hedin Construction Company, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
- McDonnell Douglas Corporation, Plaintiff-Cross and General Dynamics Corporation, Plaintiff-Cross v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.